The One True Church?

Latest Posts

The One True Church?

July 11, 2007 @ 9 Comments

Print Friendly

Pope Benedict XVI the other day reasserted the universal primacy of the Church of Rome, as he approved a document entitled “Dominus Iesus” that says, among many other things, that: (1) there is only one true church, the Roman Church, and (2) other Christian denominations are not “true churches.” This document was issued in 2000 by the “Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith” of which Benedict was a prefect. (By the way, this “Congregation” descended from the medieval Inquisition which put the 17th century astronomer Galileo under house arrest during the last years of his life for asserting that the earth revolved around the sun. In 1992, Pope John Paul II finally apologized for Rome’s error; so much for Papal infallibility.)

On the Roman Church as the only true church, “Dominus Iesus” states:

The Catholic faithful are required to profess that there is an historical continuity – rooted in the apostolic succession – between the Church founded by Christ and the Catholic Church…. Therefore, there exists a single Church of Christ, which subsists in the Catholic Church, governed by the Successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him…. [T]he ecclesial communities which have not preserved the valid Episcopate and the genuine and integral substance of the Eucharistic mystery, are not Churches in the proper sense; however, those who are baptized in these communities are, by Baptism, incorporated in Christ and thus are in a certain communion, albeit imperfect, with the Church (Articles 16 and 17).

Thus, others, especially Protestants, cannot be called “churches” “in the proper sense” because they do not have apostolic succession – tracing their ministers back to the original apostles of Christ. John Calvin called this doctrine of apostolic succession “frivolous and plainly ludicrous.” Which early church bishop could meet the requirements of being an Apostle? A man who had: (1) personally been with Jesus during his days on earth; and (2) seen the risen Lord (Acts 1:21-22). No other men after the apostles could meet these two requirements. The Apostle Paul himself said that he was the last Apostle (1 Cor. 15:7-9).

The apostolicity of the church is not because of an apostolic succession of men, but because of its apostolic teaching, “the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3), handed down to believers through Scripture. The office of the apostles was unique and unrepeatable – they laid the foundation and the foundational doctrines of the church (Eph. 2:20), and no other foundation could be laid (1 Cor. 3:10-11), not even by the Pope.

What consists a true church?

The Protestant doctrine of a true church is exemplified in Article 29 of the 1561 Belgic Confession of Faith:

The marks, by which the true Church is known, are these: if the pure doctrine of the gospel is preached therein; if she maintains the pure administration of the sacraments as instituted by Christ; if church discipline is exercised in punishing of sin.

These three marks are related to the threefold office of Christ: Prophet (preaching the gospel), Priest (administering the sacraments), and King (exercising discipline). They are also connected to the Great Commission (Matt. 28:19-20): “make disciples” (discipline), “baptizing” (sacraments), and “teaching” (preaching).

Does the Roman church exhibit any of these three marks? Maybe some, maybe sometimes. For sure, the true gospel of justification by faith alone in Christ alone by grace alone is not preached. In fact, the Roman Church still, at this very moment, affirms that “If any one says, that by faith alone the impious is justified…. let him be anathema” (Canon 9, Council of Trent). Does the Roman church properly administer the sacraments in believing the doctrine of transubstantiation and baptismal regeneration? No. Does the Roman church exercise discipline among its clergy and people? We know it certainly does not.

But what about evangelical Protestant churches: do they exhibit any of these three marks? Maybe some, maybe sometimes. Many are in no better shape than the Roman Church in professing these three marks. In fact, there has been a great movement in the evangelical churches towards the Roman Church in the doctrine of justification, e.g., “Regensburg and Regenburg II: Trying to Reconcile Irreconcilable Differences on Justification,” and the “Federal Vision.” Some other examples of evangelicals’ sleeping with Catholics and other strangers are Promise Keepers pep rallies, Passion of the Christ hysteria, Purpose-Driven chaff, and Emergent mishmash. In all of these movements, was there a “halfway” meeting point between Catholics and Protestants? No, only the Protestants have moved towards Catholic doctrines, especially on the doctrine of justification by faith alone, the article on which the church stands or falls. The Roman Church has never budged, and probably never will, from their doctrine and worship - a remarkable “not-of-this-world-ness,” in contrast to evangelicals’ pitiful “of-this-world-ness.”

Federal Vision: Towards Catholicism

And among the heirs of the Reformation, a movement called “Federal Vision,” with striking resemblances to the Roman church, is gaining adherents (“federal” from foedus, Latin for “covenant”).

In short order, here are their beliefs. First, works and grace are mixed, so that God’s grace and human works cooperate together for salvation, i.e., justification by faith and works. Second, justification is by “union with Christ” through membership in the covenant community. Third, the result of this belief in justification by membership in the covenant community is the belief in some sort of baptismal regeneration. Lastly, believing in “entrance through the covenant,” they also believe in “staying in by obedience,” rejecting the Reformed doctrine of the perseverance of the saints. (Canon 13 of the Council of Trent: “lf any one says, that a man once justified can…. [not] lose grace…. let him be anathema.”) All of these doctrines walk, smell and sound Roman Catholic, if not outright Roman Catholic.

It is not surprising then that Federal Visionists are in a slow procession towards the City of Seven Hills. A former Presbyterian, then Federal Visionist, and now Roman Catholic, says of this “homecoming”:

Many will discover that the Catholic Church is their true home, and many will discover her in a great moment of joy. This Federal Vision is really only a peek into the keyhole of the Catholic Church. The Federal Visionist has a vision of the beautiful things inside, but they have not yet appreciated the warmth of a true home.

But is this “true home” a “true church”?

Related Articles:

[] subjectofrome @ 07:00 R I stumbled across a blog called Doctrine Unites, which has a curious interpretation of the understanding the Catholic Church has of herself, not to mention a complete inability or []

Watchdog says:

I hope the San Francisco Catholic church isn’t considered the one true church. They just paid $198 million dollars of money given for the Lord’s work to victims of their pedophile priests!

Tony M. says:

Let me quote properly Philippians 2:13 “for it is God who works in you both to will and do for His good pleasure.”

Tony M. says:

The “works” passages are misunderstood as meaning “attributing to” and not “manifesting of” the sovereign hand of God working in you. Many it seems will take offense to this term “manifest” but it is simply another term for fruits. They want to insist that faith gets you something much in the same vein that the FV’s want to insist that their “works” attribute to their salvation and it simply, plainly doesn’t. We depraved sinners are always looking to get a hand in God’s salvation of us no matter how subtle. “Not of works lest any one should boast.” Jesus says it plainly “Without me you can do nothing. Union with Christ is the receiving of the atonement, the blessing of salvation accomplished by God’s right hand alone, the beginning of eternal life while here on earth unto the time God brings you home to Him. Being born again unto God alive in Christ is an act God can only do and man has no say or hand in it. “Salvation belongs to the LORD, His blessing is upon His people”.

Tony M. says:

Faith does not gain you Christ it only embraces Him whom God has already brought you into union with. God sovereignly saves you. Not one aspect of the fruits you bear after being brought into union with Christ saves you. It is as said “fruits” of your salvation..the fruit of the Spirit sealed unto you willing and working in you unto His good pleasure. Fruits also can be said as “works” which God has prepared before hand that you should walk in (and will). We wretched sinners cannot thwart the good will of God unto our salvation it is irresistible.

Nollie says:

Tony,

This union with Christ is the receiving of the atonement accomplished by His works. That is to say in Biblical terms born again, made alive together with Christ, conveyed into the kingdom of His dear Son. No, justification is not at all accomplished by man in one jot or tittle by his own works in whole or in part. It is accomplished by God alone in Christ.

I’m not really sure what you meant by the above, but to make FV’s doctrines clearer, here’s what Rick Phillips, in his essay, “Covenant Confusion,” says about FV’s view of salvation:

Since they [FV] believe that we enter into a saving relationship with God through entry into the church (rather than vice versa), then since baptism is the rite of entry into the church it is also the route of entry into all of salvation’s blessings. Instead of serving as a visible sign and seal of the covenant promise, baptism becomes the way the promise is made real to the recipient. As an example, Rich Lusk writes, “Baptism is the means through which the Spirit unites us to Christ. No other means is said to have this function; it is the peculiar grace attached to baptism… Since baptism is the instrumental means of union with Christ, it is sometimes said to be the instrument of forgiveness and regeneration (Acts 2:38, 22:16; Tit. 3:5). These are the chief blessings of union with Christ; they are offered in baptism and received by faith. In other words, baptism is simply the gospel in aqueous form.

Also, URCNA’s 2007 Synod adopted “Nine Points” of rejection of FV errors.

Tony M. says:

Thanks be to God that He is the keeper of truth, His Word and that no matter how many lies (leaven) the devil can insert God remains who He is and His will shall be done. He has commanded salvation (The Covenant of Peace). I could not help but notice the line “Justification is by union with Christ” and though in your context you are referring it to one’s visible membership in a true church be it by profession of faith or infant baptism I wish to say it is of itself a true statement. This union with Christ is the receiving of the atonement accomplished by His works. That is to say, in Biblical terms, born again, made alive together with Christ, conveyed into the kingdom of His dear Son. No, justification is not at all accomplished by man in one jot or tittle by his own works in whole or in part. It is accomplished by God alone in Christ. Not even faith (the exercise thereof) gains or attributes or acquires anything including the righteousness of God.

Justification by faith Biblically means “not of works lest any man should boast”. We are reconciled (made alive and no longer estranged, at peace) unto God in whole by union with Christ through His works. By His blood our sins are removed and by His righteousness we stand forever upright before God. When God says, “Freely you have received,” He means by a sovereign act of God you have been set apart in Christ with out an iota of works on your part, not even the “have mercy” prayer. With this said I’m not saying one does not repent and believe. I’m saying BECAUSE you have been joined to Christ you WILL repent and believe but the latter does not gain you anything unto salvation of itself.

[…] Doctrine Unites: The One True Church? […]

Gil Garcia says:

I believe in the pope, binder and looser in heaven, earth, and hell, and in Simony, his only son our lord, who was conceived by the canon law and born of the Romish church. Under his power truth suffered, was crucified, dead and buried, and through the ban descended to hell, rose again through the gospel and Paul and was brought to Charles, sitting at his right hand, who in future is to rule over spiritual and wordly things. I believe in the canon law, in the Romish church, in the destruction of faith and of the communion of saints, in indulgences both for the remission of guilt and penalty in purgatory, in the resurrection of the flesh in an Epicurean life, because given to us by the Holy Father, the pope. Amen.

© 2013 Doctrine Unites!.